Home/Learn/Legal roles/Coroner in the UK: role and inquest explained
Legal rolesEngland & Wales

Coroner in the UK: role and inquest explained

Plain-English guide to UK coroners. When involved, post-mortem, inquest process, types of conclusion, Article 2 inquests, families' rights.

Peter Kolomiets10 min readUpdated 2026-05-28

Coroner in the UK: role and inquest explained

When someone dies unexpectedly, and their cause is unclear or unusual, a coroner steps in. They are an independent judicial officer whose job is to establish the facts: who has died, when, where, and how. This guide explains what coroners do, when they get involved, and what happens during an inquest.

The short version

A coroner is a judge who investigates sudden, violent, unnatural, or unexplained deaths. They conduct post-mortems and hold inquests, which are public hearings where evidence is heard and a conclusion is recorded. Coroners work under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. If the state may have failed to protect life, an Article 2 inquest is held. Families have the right to attend, ask questions, and seek legal representation.

At a glance

Aspect Detail
Role Independent judicial officer investigating deaths
Legal basis Coroners and Justice Act 2009
When involved Sudden, violent, unnatural, unknown cause, in custody, workplace
Key steps Reporting, post-mortem, pre-inquest review, inquest hearing
Conclusion types Natural causes, accident, suicide, unlawful killing, narrative, neglect, open
Article 2 inquests When the state may have breached duty to protect life
Family rights Attendance, questioning witnesses, legal representation, legal aid available

What a coroner is

A coroner is a judge appointed by a local authority. Unlike criminal or civil court judges, they do not decide guilt or innocence. Instead, they investigate deaths and establish the facts. Coroners are trained lawyers or medical examiners who have many years of experience. They are independent of the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), though they work alongside them.

The coroner's role is defined by the common law duty of the Crown and by statute. They must be fair, impartial, and conduct their investigations transparently. Most inquests are held in public, and families have a right to attend and participate.

Coroners and Justice Act 2009 framework

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 is the main law governing coroners in England and Wales. It sets out:

  • When a coroner must investigate
  • How post-mortems are conducted
  • The inquest process and rules
  • The types of conclusions available
  • Duties to investigate deaths in certain circumstances

Under the Act, a coroner must investigate if the deceased died a violent or unnatural death, or if the cause is unknown. They must also investigate deaths in prison, police custody, or following restraint by state officials. The Act also created the role of Assistant Coroner to help with workload.

If you want to read the Act yourself, it is available on the legislation.gov.uk website. The key Part is Part 1, which covers the coroner system.

When a coroner gets involved

A coroner will be involved in the following situations:

  • Sudden death where the cause is not known
  • Violent or unnatural death such as accident, suicide, or assault
  • Death in custody in prison, police station, or following restraint by police or state officials
  • Death following surgery or medical procedure where there is doubt about the cause or manner
  • Workplace death if a Health and Safety Executive investigation is underway
  • Death abroad of a UK citizen, in limited circumstances
  • Stillbirth if there is suspicion of criminality

In most cases, a doctor or police officer will report the death to the coroner. If you believe a death should be reported, you can contact the coroner's office directly.

Reporting a death to the coroner

When someone dies, the hospital, care home, or doctor will usually notify the coroner if they think a coroner's investigation is needed. If a death happens outside hospital (such as at home or at the scene of an accident), the police will typically report it.

You can also report a death to the coroner yourself. Each local area has a coroner's office. You can find the contact details on your local authority's website. Provide the name of the deceased, date of death, and reason you believe the coroner should investigate.

If a death is reported to the coroner, they will decide whether an investigation is needed. If not, the coroner will notify the doctor so they can issue a death certificate. If an investigation is needed, the coroner will order a post-mortem examination.

Post-mortem examination

A post-mortem examination is a medical examination of the body carried out by a pathologist (a doctor specialising in disease and cause of death). The coroner orders it to try to establish the cause of death.

There are two types:

Coroner's post-mortem (forensic post-mortem): Conducted on behalf of the coroner. The family does not have a legal right to object, but the coroner will consider any religious or cultural wishes. The findings are used to decide whether an inquest is needed.

Hospital post-mortem: Ordered by doctors before the coroner becomes involved. The family can object to this type. This is less common now.

The results of the post-mortem are reported to the coroner. If the cause of death is clear and natural (such as a heart attack or cancer), the coroner may issue a death certificate and an inquest may not be needed.

If the cause is unclear or suspicious, the coroner will usually order further investigation and arrange an inquest.

Inquest process

An inquest is a public hearing where the coroner (and sometimes a jury) hears evidence about how someone died. The aim is to establish the facts, not to determine guilt or innocence or to blame anyone.

Opening hearing: The coroner holds an opening hearing, which is usually brief. The purpose is to confirm the identity of the deceased and to set out what evidence will be heard. The case may be adjourned while the police continue their investigation.

Adjournment for investigation: If police are investigating a death as a potential crime, the inquest is adjourned. The police must complete their investigation before the main inquest hearing. If a prosecution follows, the inquest is suspended until the trial is finished.

Full hearing: Once investigation is complete, a date is set for the full inquest hearing. Evidence is presented, which may include:

  • Post-mortem report
  • Police investigation report
  • Medical records and history
  • Witness statements and testimony
  • CCTV footage, if available
  • Expert evidence (such as from accident investigators or engineers)

The coroner questions witnesses and examines the evidence. Interested persons (such as family or trade unions) may ask questions through their solicitor. After all evidence is heard, the coroner sums up and records a conclusion.

Who attends an inquest

The coroner: Leads the hearing and makes the final decision.

The jury (sometimes): A jury of 7 to 11 is required if the death occurred in state custody or if there is a suggestion the death was caused by an unlawful act by a police officer or person acting on behalf of the state. In other cases, the coroner decides alone.

Interested persons: These include the family of the deceased, trade unions, representatives of employers, and any person who may have a legal liability for the death. They have the right to attend, hear evidence, and ask witnesses questions (through their solicitor if they have one).

Legal representatives: Families and other interested persons can instruct solicitors and barristers to represent them at the inquest.

Police and CPS: Representatives may attend, particularly if a crime is suspected.

Pathologist and other experts: Those who conducted the post-mortem and other specialists give evidence.

Inquests are held in open court. The public and press can attend (unless the coroner decides otherwise in rare circumstances, such as national security).

Types of conclusion

After hearing all evidence, the coroner records a conclusion. This sets out the facts about how the death occurred. The types of conclusion available under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 are:

Natural causes: Death resulted from a medical condition, such as heart disease, stroke, or cancer. No external factor contributed.

Accident: Death was unintentional and resulted from the actions or negligence of the deceased or another person. Examples include road traffic accidents, falls, and drowning.

Suicide: The coroner is satisfied that the deceased deliberately ended their life, and the balance of probability supports this conclusion.

Unlawful killing: The coroner is satisfied that the death was caused by an unlawful act of another person. This is rare and usually occurs after a murder conviction at trial. The conclusion does not determine guilt: that is done by a jury in criminal court.

Narrative verdict: Used when the facts do not fit neatly into the above categories. The coroner writes a narrative summary of how the death occurred, without assigning it to a single category.

Conclusion not yet reached: Used when there is insufficient evidence. The case may be reopened if new evidence emerges.

Neglect: Available when the death was caused by a substantial and direct breach of a duty of care owed to the deceased by a person who had responsibility. This might include a care home, hospital, or employer. This conclusion is relatively uncommon.

Open: The coroner cannot determine how the death occurred on the balance of probability. This might happen if crucial evidence is missing.

The conclusion is recorded in a formal document called the Inquisition. Copies are provided to the family and relevant agencies.

Article 2 inquests

Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides that everyone has a right to life. In the UK, this means the state has a duty to protect life in certain circumstances. If a death occurs in state custody or under state responsibility, the coroner must conduct an "Article 2 inquest" which examines whether the state breached this duty.

An Article 2 inquest is more thorough than a standard inquest. It must:

  • Investigate all relevant facts
  • Consider whether the state failed in its duty to protect life
  • Be conducted with proper involvement of the family
  • Examine systemic failings and risks

Common circumstances where Article 2 applies:

  • Death in prison
  • Death in police custody
  • Death following mental health crisis intervention by state officials
  • Death of a child in care or following involvement of social services
  • Death of a vulnerable person where state had knowledge of risk

Families have enhanced rights in Article 2 inquests, including the right to funding for legal representation. The conclusion may include a finding that the state failed in its duty to protect.

Prevention of Future Deaths reports

If an inquest reveals a risk of future deaths, the coroner can issue a Regulation 28 report (also called a Prevention of Future Deaths report). This is addressed to a public body, employer, or organisation. It asks them to take action to prevent a similar death.

Examples include recommendations to improve safety procedures, staff training, equipment maintenance, or policies.

The recipient organisation must respond within 56 days, explaining what action will be taken. The coroner's office publishes these reports, which are a valuable source of learning from deaths.

Family rights at inquest

Bereaved families have several important rights during an inquest:

Right to attend: The hearing is held in public. Family members can attend and sit in the courtroom.

Right to legal representation: You can instruct a solicitor or barrister to represent you. They can ask witnesses questions and make submissions to the coroner.

Right to legal aid: If you are bereaved and cannot afford to pay for a solicitor, you may be eligible for legal aid. This is means-tested and available in most inquest cases.

Right to ask questions: If you have a solicitor, they can question witnesses on your behalf. The coroner has discretion to allow questions without a solicitor in some cases.

Right to information: You can request copies of post-mortem reports, police investigation summaries, and witness statements. These are usually provided to interested persons.

Right to independent expert advice: If you wish to obtain your own expert report (such as from a pathologist or engineer), you can do so and present it at the inquest.

Right to make representations: You can submit written statements or (through your solicitor) make oral submissions before the conclusion is recorded.

Coroner's office vs criminal court

Many families ask how an inquest differs from a criminal trial. The key differences are:

Purpose: A criminal trial determines guilt or innocence of a defendant. An inquest establishes the facts of how death occurred. It does not determine criminal responsibility.

Standard of proof: In criminal court, guilt must be proved "beyond reasonable doubt" (a high standard). In an inquest, the coroner applies "the balance of probabilities" (more likely than not). This is a lower standard.

Parties: In criminal court, there is a prosecutor (CPS), a defendant, and a judge or jury. In an inquest, there is the coroner and interested persons. No one is "on trial".

Outcome: A criminal trial results in a verdict of guilty or not guilty. An inquest results in a conclusion about how death occurred.

Timing: If a crime is suspected, the inquest is adjourned until after any criminal trial. Only then does the full inquest hearing take place.

If a death is being investigated as a potential crime, criminal proceedings and the inquest will run in parallel or sequence, but they are separate processes.

Day to day: an inquest timeline

Here is how an inquest typically unfolds:

Day 1-7: Death reported to coroner. Coroner decides whether to investigate.

Week 1-2: If investigation ordered, post-mortem arranged.

Week 2-4: Post-mortem results received. Coroner reviews and decides next steps.

Week 2-8: If criminal investigation needed, police take the lead. Inquest is adjourned.

Month 1-12: Police investigation continues. Family may request updates from coroner's office.

Month 3-18: Police investigation concluded. File sent to CPS or closed.

Month 4-24: Coroner arranges pre-inquest review hearing (brief) and sets date for full inquest.

Week before inquest: Coroner and parties confirm which evidence will be presented and any issues to resolve.

Inquest hearing: Usually 1 to 5 days (sometimes longer for complex cases). Evidence heard. Conclusion recorded.

Week after: Inquisition (formal document) issued. Copies sent to family, NHS, employers, and other relevant bodies.

Timelines vary greatly depending on whether a crime is involved, the complexity of the death, and the coroner's court workload. Some inquests take 6 months; others take 2 years or longer.

Common misconceptions

"An inquest is a trial." No. An inquest is not a trial. No one is being prosecuted or judged for guilt. The aim is to establish facts.

"The coroner will decide if a crime was committed." No. The coroner does not decide guilt or innocence. If a crime is suspected, criminal courts handle that. The coroner's conclusion about the facts may support a criminal prosecution, but it does not determine guilt.

"The family must prove what happened." No. The coroner bears the responsibility to investigate and gather evidence. The family does not have to prove anything, though they can present evidence and ask questions.

"If the conclusion is 'unlawful killing', the death is a murder." No. A conclusion of 'unlawful killing' means the coroner believes an unlawful act caused the death. It is not the same as a murder conviction. Guilt is determined in criminal court.

"Inquests are private." No. Inquests are held in public, and the media can attend and report. The public can access the conclusion through the coroner's office.

"We cannot afford a solicitor." You may be eligible for legal aid, which covers the cost of a solicitor if you are bereaved. Ask the coroner's office or contact a solicitor.

"The coroner can overrule police findings." No. The coroner is independent and considers all evidence, including police reports. But the coroner does not overrule the CPS's decision on prosecution.

  • Death certificate and registering a death
  • Sudden Unexpected Nocturnal Death Syndrome (SUNDS)
  • Medical negligence and duty of care
  • Criminal law and unlawful killing
  • Legal aid: eligibility and how to apply
  • Coronial law: prevention and systemic change
  • Complaints about NHS care
  • Workplace death and HSE investigations
  • Mental health crisis and state duty of care
  • Truth and justice after unexpected death

Sources


Disclaimer: This page provides information about UK coroners and the inquest process. It is not legal advice. If you are involved in a case, you should seek advice from a qualified solicitor. Legal aid may be available.

Written by Peter Kolomiets, founder of CaseCalm. UK content reviewed 2026-05-28.

Peter Kolomiets
Founder, CaseCalm

I got sued in the UK and ended up defending myself in court for the better part of two years — reading the rules, filling in the forms, sitting through hearings. The system isn’t really scary once you’ve seen it from the inside. It’s just that nobody explains it.

So I started writing the guide I wish I’d had when the first letter arrived. That’s all this site is.

Sources

Not legal advice. This page is for information only. For your situation, consult a qualified solicitor or Direct Access barrister. This page provides information about UK coroners. It is not legal advice.